Back to Conference session list

Session Detail (plenary)

Round table: "Collaboration networks on Pacific Islands’ research in Europe and beyond" -- Convened by Elisabeth Worliczek and Matthias Kowasch



Session presentation

Despite a shift of global political attention from the Middle East to the Asia-Pacific Region, research in social sciences with a regional focus on the Pacific Island countries is still marginal at the global scale. There are several hubs in Europe (and beyond) that work on Pacific Islands’ issues. Some of them are connected, but these connections rely mainly on individual interests and personal contacts. In this plenary roundtable, we therefore invite researchers from different disciplines and from different research groups and countries to present and discuss their academic networks and the focus of their research.
First, we aim to connect researchers with similar research interests and projects. Second, we want to analyze how researchers establish collaboration networks. The third aim is to discuss the historical background for research in certain countries (e.g. due to the colonial history of countries), but also individual and/or institutional preferences and reasons (e.g. language barriers).
By addressing collaboration networks, we would like to discuss research priorities and unequal regional focuses of scholars. We particularly invite Pacific islanders and Indigenous researchers to share their points of view and their collaboration networks.
Based on this exchange, we intend to publish papers in a special issue of an international peer-reviewed journal. Moreover, this plenary roundtable can be the basis for a thorough network analysis to be used for prospective (research) projects, and the weaving of new ties in and between European and Pacific Island countries and beyond.


The Demise of Pacific Studies in the Netherlands



Toon van Meijl
Radboud University Nijmegen


Pacific Studies was a thriving field of research and teaching in the Netherlands until recently. The first European Colloquium on Pacific Studies was organised at Radboud University Nijmegen in 1992, when the European Society for Oceanists was set up. Dutch scholars also organised two other ESfO conferences, in Leiden (1999) and Brussels (2015). At the moment, however, the number of scholars affiliated to a university in the Netherlands and who are working on the Pacific is very low, with an equally low number of students opting for research in the Pacific. The last meeting of the Netherlands Association for Oceanic Studies took place more than five years ago, while the Centre for Pacific and Asian Studies at Radboud University lost institutional support after 35 years.
In this paper, a preliminary analysis will be presented of the demise of Pacific Studies in the Netherlands. Reasons will be sought in changing funding policies with an enhanced focus on societal relevance. This shift paralleled the neoliberalization of higher education, with the abolition of scholarships and the introduction of student loans. As a consequence, university degrees are regarded as an investment that must return results in the form of a well-paid job. Finally, anthropology programmes are paying more attention to diversity issues in postcolonial Europe, which shift took place partly in response to the neoliberalization of higher education as well.

The ANU's Pacific networks - a critical review



Chris Ballard
Australian National University


The Australian National University or ANU has had a long involvement in Pacific training and research since the Research School of Pacific Studies was first established in 1946. The initial research focus through the humanities disciplines of anthropology, archaeology, geography, history and linguistics has expanded to encompass Pacific-related training and research across every college of the ANU. To some extent, the large number of staff and students engaged in Pacific research and training has generated a dual challenge of building, extending and maintaining collaborative networks both within and beyond the ANU.

A trusted French-German-Pacific synergy



Elodie Fache
IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement


Initially based on interpersonal relations among a small group of scholars from IRD, ZMT and USP, the research project SOCPacific – A Sea of Connections: Contextualizing Fisheries in the South Pacific Region (https://socpacific.net/) – has involved a strong synergy between its French, German, and Pacific direct participants (including a dozen or so students), while benefitting from the guidance of a large and international consortium of external partners. This research network has been further strengthened and expanded through the development and recent submission of a follow-up project on reef passages as social-ecological keystone places and communication zones, with a main geographical focus on Fiji and New Caledonia. Both these initiatives build on a close dialogue between social sciences and marine/conservation sciences, within and outside of academia, as the basis for a transdisciplinary study of these under-researched features of the land-ocean continuum. The French-German-Pacific synergy on which they rely, together with their significant capacity-building components, aim to contribute to “turning the tide of parachute science” and carrying out fair and equitable research.

The potentials and limitations of the ‘RG Ozeanien’



Dominik Schieder
University of Siegen

Anita von Poser
Freie Universität Berlin


This paper introduces the ‘RG Ozeanien’, i.e., the German Anthropological Association’s (GAA) Oceania Regional Working Group. This GAA sub-group has been conceptualized as an open forum for anthropologists and scholars from neighbouring disciplines in the German-speaking world who specialize in the societies and cultures of Oceania. However, it not only aims to foster research dialogue within this narrow field as it is also intended to serve German-speaking Oceanists as a platform for international networking and collaboration. The RG Ozeanien also promotes museum exhibitions and public engagement pertaining to contemporary issues relating to Oceania. The RG Ozeanien currently consists of nearly eighty members and is one of the largest sub-groups under the GAA umbrella. At the same time, its ability to function as an active hub for (international) networking and engagement is hampered by a general institutional insignificance of the Anthropology of Oceania within the German-speaking academic world.

Project Pouono-Networking in the Negotiated Space



Mike Poltorak
University of Kent


The transmedia project, Project Pouono, enscapsulates and expands the formal and informal networks actuated and affirmed during the production and distribution of the ethnographic documentary, The Healer and the Psychiatrist. In Tonga this includes the WHO, government institutions like the Tongan Ministry of Health, Universities such as 'Atenisi University and Lo'au University, but more significantly networks of responsibility and commitment emergent from research and involvement in Tonga since 1998. These have expanded into New Zealand and Australia, and institutions that nurture Tongan contributions to scholarship.

In Tongan terms, tending the va (the space that connects), is vital to the creation and maintenance of projects that intend to contribute to improvements in health outcomes. Project Pouono is a ‘negotiated space’ (Mila and Hudson 2009) emergent of Tongan values and ways of communication, the creation of peopled spaces of mediation and action informed by multiple interpretations. It is a place of informed, principled and sensitive action, a metaphorical meeting of Pacific water and land with potential impact wherever Pacific water meets a shore.