Back to Conference session list

Session Detail (parallel)

House Connections Within and Beyond Oceania

Coordinator(s)


Roger Ivar Lohmann


Session presentation

Constructed shelters connect to the individuals, societies, cultures, and ecosystems that meet and manifest in them. Papers in this session describe and analyse buildings as sources of information about the living beings, groups, creations, environments, and relationships across time and space of which they are a part. Oceania’s architectural traditions vary tremendously. Beside recently developed and introduced structures, ancestral forms range from massive stone monuments such as Pohnpei’s Nan Madol to brush shelters like Aboriginal Australia’s lean-tos. Some keep in the warmth, like round houses of the New Guinea’s Highlands, while others invite cool breezes, like the Samoan fono and New Guinean treehouses. Some sort people by gender, age, physiological condition, or other locally recognised statuses and concerns, such as men’s clubhouses, taboo spirit houses, menstrual houses, and birth houses. Houses are technical achievements that reflect political, religious, and other ideas and assumptions current among the people who build, renovate, and use them. Some shelter entire communities under a single longhouse roof, while others divide people into smaller groupings, separated by walls or freestanding buildings with varying degrees of space between them. In short, the shelters of Oceania vary in form, style, complexity, formality, materials, construction methods, partitioning, placement in relation to one another and to landscapes, uses, meanings, and many other ways. What can be learned of the bodies and ideas of their builders and occupants from the comparative study of specific ecologies, technologies, and styles of houses, and vice versa? Participants of diverse disciplines are invited to share and ideally integrate ethnographic, linguistic, archaeological, human biological, or other data and analyses centred on Oceanic houses of particular regions and time periods.


Paper submissions are closed



Accepted papers


Fear of Menstrual Blood in Ancestral Asabano Architecture



Roger Ivar Lohmann (Trent University)


This paper describes the traditional architecture of the Asabano people of Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea as it was circa 1950, shortly before contact, based on interviews with elder informants in the 1990s, Australian colonial patrol reports of the 1960s, and observed continuities and changes in architecture in the 1990s and 2000s. Exploring the assumption that the same cultural creations can exist in ideal, behavioural, and artefactual forms, I trace a single belief’s expression from cognitive schemas through speech and construction behaviours to traditional architectural forms. The traditional belief that menstrual blood was dangerous to men’s health and ability to hunt was reflected in the floorplans and door placement of communal houses, the construction of separate menstrual and birth huts, and the construction of male-only spirit houses.

My Ancestral Home Milingimbi: From Ruin to Biographical Text Reading Method



Mere Marina Taito (University of Otago)


The ruin of our ancestral home Milingimbi has been instrumental in allowing me to read my grandfather’s texts "My Own Story" and "The Aborigines of the North". I offer the ruin approach as a way to enter and chart the reading of these texts and its consequential effects on the writing of a collection of multilingual archival digital visual poetry. In this approach, the texts are read as ‘ruined story’ while the selection of poems ‘La’ seksek se Milingimbi’ is written within the frame of a ‘storied ruin’. I address three critical guiding questions: (1) What would happen if I treat text and ruin as ‘different but same’ forms? (2) How can the structural features of Milingimbi help me critically read and creatively write in response to "My Own Story" and "The Aborigines of the North"? (3) Can I find synchronicity in both ruin and text? I demonstrate how structural elements of Milingimbi have been useful in revealing corresponding key text trigger points in the texts. In doing so, I argue that text and ruin are synchronous. In finding connections between ruin and texts, I re-energise and reactivate the value of these archival and ancestral objects and reiterate the many innovative possibilities of engaging with Indigenous biographical mission texts.

Symbolism and Spatial Order of the House (Suwe) in Western Fiji



Pauline McKenzie Aucoin (University of Ottawa, Ottawa)


Anthropological studies of space and place recognize that landscape, built space and the body represent important sites for cultural meaning, social and political memory, and public discourse. With this in mind, this paper explores the symbolic, linguistic and spatial significance of the term suwe in Western Fijian society; a word that refers to a family house but can also be compounded in words such as suwe vatu, which is the arrangement of three stones upon which a pot can be rested above a fire. More than simply a built space, the suwe is embedded in the spatial symbolic dimension within which Western Fijian culture is lived and experienced. Space in Fiji represents an important cultural medium, an idiom through which individuals can think and a dimension that can be culturally organized to produce spatial practices that are at once social, aesthetic, political, gendered, and religious. A central aspect of this spatial organization is its symbolic axis that establishes a geo-symbolic order (Geertz) with distinctions of high/sacred/empowered vs low/profane/unempowered. At once symbolic and political, this order is evident in the cultural organization of both village space – as reflected in the physical positioning of the suwe in relation to clan’s men’s houses and ceremonial fields; and with the demarcation of higher and lower areas within the suwe that affect the placement of persons and arrangement of objects within the suwe itself.