In Oceania in a wide area of fields as diverse as environmentalism, development and humanitarianism, rights-based activism, resource extraction, neoliberal capitalism and even new religions, local actors and communities encounter seemingly global concepts, ideas and practices. Often these interventions are mediated by persons such as development and climate change experts, rights activists, national government and/or NGO employees. Actors may embrace these new concepts and models as a welcome agent of change, negotiate and assemble bits and pieces according to their needs or reject and disengage because these concepts and practices are perceived as part of a seemingly outside world of individuals, remote expert knowledge, and the global neoliberal economy in an unequal world. In every case, people actively encounter new concepts, models, and practices and shape their lifeworlds in these processes. Scholars have analyzed these different dynamics as frictions (Tsing 2005), translations (Lewis and Mosse 2006), vernacularizations (Levitt and Merry 2009), or as encounters of ontologies (Blaser 2009). While earlier works often assumed a clear dichotomy between the local and the global, more recent works have shown how people’s (dis)engagement with these processes is historically, politically and economically contingent. Furthermore, people’s and communities’ prior experiences with interventions in different fields may have a major impact on how they deal with new encounters today (Emde and Scheer forthcoming). In this panel we specifically invite papers that take into account people’s previous histories and experiences with implemented programmes, policies, projects or schemes and investigate how these impact on their willingness or resistance to engage with current concepts and practices often characterised as ‘global’. We are also interested in ethnographic insights into people’s negotiations of multiple encounters that happen simultaneously and/or even may be contradictory.
Paper submissions are closed