Oceania has long been at the centre of anthropological cogitations. It is – not to mention – the birthplace of classic anthropological fieldwork. From Bronislaw Malinowski to Marshall Sahlins, concepts and practices of seminal importance to the construction of theories and methodologies of the dominant Western anthropological discourse have developed in interaction with Pacific cultures and/or in relation with their material or immaterial aspects. But how objects and ideas from Oceania have circulated in space and time, helping to shape careers, schools, museums, theories, paradigms, representations and practices in marginal anthropological traditions such as, e.g., the Norwegian, Italian, Turkish, Russian, Brazilian or Japanese? In a perspective that aims at pluralizing the history of anthropology beyond the French and Anglo-American (major) traditions (Barrera-González, Heintz, Horolets 2017; Bérose 2017-2021; Histories of Anthropology Annual 2014-2021) and challenging a monolithic view of contemporary anthropology as a unified discipline emanating from the West (Restrepo 2005; Lins Ribeiro, Escobar 2006; 2018), in this panel we invite participants to critically investigate the complexities and the embeddedness of anthropological knowledge transfer between Oceania and ’minor’ European scholarly traditions and/or World Anthropologies. In particular, we would like to explore questions like: How, how deep and at what point, material and immaterial aspects of the Pacific area impacted on the formation of marginal traditions? It was by direct contact or by “travelling theory” (Said 1982)? Following which courses, people, ideas, images, and/or objects? How Pacific anthropological data and Pacific-based theoretical traits were selected and accepted by the hosting traditions? Which weight, respectively, Pacific material and immaterial have held? How the circulation of Pacific “travelling” concepts, objects and theories can help us better understand (and challenge) the dynamic of knowledge production and transfer, and the same conceptual distinction between material and immaterial? We welcome original case studies from ethnographical and historical perspectives as well as papers based on consistent visual documentation (pictures, drawings, video, etc.) and/or addressing these topics within the larger theoretical developments in contemporary anthropology.
Paper submissions are closed