‘Life Itself’ stands for the biological and social reimaginations arising from the conceptual collapse of 'nature' and 'culture' - ideas that underpinned the critical assumptions hampering ethnographic attempts to describe Oceanic metaphysics in their own terms. ‘Life Itself’ was first named by Foucault, and developed by Franklin, Rose and Haraway to describe 'genomic thinking'; the ‘technologization of life itself’ as a 'system to be managed'; and governing life itself via the internal and external life choices of citizens. ‘Life Itself’ has been deployed to describe new forms of biology, kinship, governance, society, technology, ecology, ethics, policy and human being - and these discourses characterise national as much as international visions of inequality and development. Do descriptions of social life in Oceania in these biological derived registers in fact promote and exacerbate inequality? ‘Life Itself’ provides a distinctive vantage point on Oceanic philosophies: that the corollaries of this ‘genetic imaginary’ are here and there circumvents the issue of ascribing ideas to peoples or regions or epochs, and yet motivates a fresh attempt to understand life itself in Oceanic terms. If relationality provides the ‘vital supports for all living persons’, then how do Oceanic peoples now imagine the energetics and causalities of life itself?
Paper submissions are closed