This session invites a discussion on gender-related research experiences in Oceania. The Pacific has a long tradition of male and female researchers who have had distinct gendered experiences and outcomes of fieldwork (e.g. Mead/Freeman, Malinowski/Weiner etc). As ‘nominal males’, some female anthropologists had access to male domains (e.g. Hauser-Schäublin in the Sepik), while in other places women were forbidden to enter the men’s house (e.g. Kuehling in Micronesia). We believe that it is important to re-open the topic with a focus on the relation of age, gender and experience in various field sites. How do age and gender of a researcher influence her/his situation in the field? Are some research projects and contexts more vulnerable to gender violence, barriers between the sexes, discrimination, and misunderstandings than others; and if so, why? We invite papers that engage with these themes by asking: •Are there specific methodologies that “work” better for male or female researchers in Oceania? •How does age feature in relation to gender during field work? •Which strategies are we using to overcome barriers based on gender, age, and skin color? •Has fieldwork in relation to gender changed since the colonial period? •How is gender a feature of specific types of research (activism, survey work, long-term study, working in rural or urban regions)? Papers on gendered research relationships, and on the limits and potential hazards of ignoring, idealizing, or simplifying gender dimensions during field research are especially welcome.
Paper submissions are closed